Site icon Mode Shift Omaha

Have Your Say on the S-Curve Project and the Future of Midtown

The City and HDR have made great progress on the S-Curve Area Connectivity Project, an endeavor to remedy poor circulation and prepare for increased development in and around Midtown.  The potential value to the community is evident in the project goals:

Unfortunately, the preliminary concepts presented at the November 29th public meeting appear fixated on accommodating future traffic above everything else. Future traffic is about additional trips.  With the Central Omaha Alternatives Analysis, the Harney Street Cycletrack and an extension of the Turner Blvd Trail well on their way, there is no reason to expect that new trips will have to be by car.

This project should be more about the people than the capacity. In other words, what is going to make people want to live, eat, shop and invest in the area? The quality and the character of redevelopment will match that of the streets we build. If the vision for the neighborhood is urban infill where people walk, bike, take transit and drive, then there should be no alternative that substantially increases capacity for cars and/or tears down homes and businesses in the process.  Based on that criteria, 1B, 2E and 4 are the best concepts.  All the other concepts will make the area more hazardous and inhospitable for residents, customers and people in general.

As a community, it is essential that we enable the project team to focus on the neighborhood.  Informing them that these are the top three will clearly communicate that we want Midtown to mature into Omaha’s next great neighborhood.  Otherwise, the planners and engineers will understandably revert to the status quo: transportation for the sake of transportation. Your comments empower their creativity.

These alternatives are not set in stone, and the final “preferred” alternative will be a mixture of these designs.  So when you contact the city and the consultants, feel free to specifically call out what you like and what you don’t like as well (but stay positive, constructive criticism).  Once the preferred alternative is decided on, it’s unlikely to change.  Think of this as your last chance to have your voice heard, at least on how traffic flow will be configured for this area.

Comments will be accepted until January 6, 2013. Click here to email your comments.

To help you understand the alternatives being considered, here is a quick breakdown…

Current Condition

Keeping the S-Curve in the Current Location

Alternative 1A

Alternative 1B* one of the options recommended by ModeShift

Alternative 1C

Moving the S-Curve to Over I-480

Alternative 2A

Alternative 2B

Alternative 2C

Alternative 2D

Alternative 2E* one of the options recommended by ModeShift

Moving the S-Curve to East of I-480

Alternative 3

No S-Curve

Alternative 4* one of the options recommended by ModeShift


Some potential additions to your comments:

Exit mobile version