Tag Archives: complete streets

Five Questions for . . . Stephen Osberg

11 Nov

The November Coffee Chat is coming up Friday, November 18 and we wanted to get to know our special Guest, Stephen Osberg — one of the planners for the city of Omaha — a little better. So we asked him these questions.headshot-osberg-1

1. What is your preferred mode of transportation?

I like to get around through a variety of means when I have that option, preferably on foot helped out by transit or on a bicycle. In the city, I like driving the least, yet I find myself behind a steering wheel for most trips these days.

2. What, in your opinion, is the greatest challenge to multi-modal transportation in Omaha?

I think we need to think about how we choose to prioritize the different uses of streets. Streets are our city’s most prevalent public spaces, and they are used for everything from outdoor dining and walking to driving or biking. We all use them in a variety of ways, but we tend to most closely associate them with driving. That focus ends up carrying over to our funding priorities. Our ongoing Complete Streets project is a a joint effort by the Public Works and Planning Departments to formalize the process by which we design our streets to achieve a greater balance between priorities. Continue reading

On Complete Streets

29 Jun

Omaha’s Complete Streets Policy will go before the Planning Board on Wednesday July 1 and, assuming it passes, will find its way to the City Council for its first of three readings on July 28. Four Mode Shift Omaha board members served as stakeholders throughout the process, and we’re generally pretty happy with where everything stands.

Here’s our quick take:

This policy doesn’t require anything. It’s not an ordinance. It’s not a change in code. It doesn’t have much for teeth. BUT, it could lay the foundation for something good. Ultimately, it all depends on how it’s implemented.

The next steps in the process are really critical. Namely the creation of Street Design Guidelines, which hopefully include a detailed section on implementation, are the most important aspect of the entire process. The Guidelines should get down into the details of what it means for a street to be “complete” in certain contexts and transects. Treatments will need to vary based on each street’s typology, and the Guidelines should be built to ensure the treatments are good.

The policy specifically references design manuals from the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as models, which is promising. They are both great and form the basis for many cities’ successful Complete Streets programs. For example, Chicago’s guidelines list priorities between the modes for each type of street based on context and purpose. Pedestrians are nearly always listed first, which makes a lot of sense to us.

The proposed policy also makes the case for adequate staffing in Public Works to handle multimodal issues. We couldn’t agree more and hope that means they will be able/willing to hire someone who knows the ins and outs of this work like the back of their hand.

One concern within the policy is the latitude provided for exceptions to occur and the limited transparency around reporting on those exceptions. While these aren’t ideal, we don’t believe it’s worth throwing the baby out with the bath water.

The main questions: how will these new guidelines actually affect the design and construction of our city’s streets? How will these guidelines work with land use controls to create places where driving isn’t the default means of getting around? Will there be a dedicated funding stream for non-motorized transportation projects? These questions will be answered in the next phases of this project: development of guidelines and actual implementation. And, to be successful, the forthcoming process and its outcomes need commitment from Public Works and the Mayor. So far it looks like they’re committed.